(what it could look like)
– Proposal buried in the Department of Homeland Security funding bill.
– A bill has already passed the House of Representatives.
– The bill will come before the Senate in the near future.
– There are currently federal and state laws preventing military or civil officers anywhere an election is being held.
– DHS would be “assisted” by the king of the voter fraud myth, Kris Kobach, who specializes in voter suppression. He created Operation Interstate Crosscheck, a list of voters that has been used to purge voters from the rolls.
– This scheme arises after Trump’s Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity has disbanded, after failure to find examples of voter fraud, and accusations of attempted voter suppression. However, Trump didn’t shut down the investigation or acknowledge that voter fraud is a non-issue. However, Trump has now turned the task of creating the illusion of widespread voter fraud over to the Department of Homeland Security. The Department of Homeland Security is a cabinet-level agency that has access to much of the data the commission requested but couldn’t get from the states.
– This scheme arises after Trump said he wants to conduct a military parade in Washington, D.C.
– Department of Homeland Security includes the Secret Service.
– Department of Homeland Security also includes the federal Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
The Pennsylvania state court struck down gerrymandered districts and Republican state lawmakers have gone ballistic. After their appeals were rejected by the (Democratic majority) state and (Republican majority) supreme courts, Republican lawmakers in Pennsylvania are now trying it again, filing appeals with federal and supreme courts to stay the order, and would probably appeal to any other court that would hear them. They’re even officially calling for the impeachment of four (4) state justices.
The courts have finally, after 7 years, made a substantial and long-overdue decision on the court case against the mind-numbingly gerrymandered voting districts in Pennsylvania. Anyone with eyesight could see that many of the districts are twisted, contorted, choked, and demonstrably tortured for the partisan benefit of Republican party candidates – and the court agreed. Republicans have now controlled 70% of the representatives even though they only have 44% of the registered voters. Voter suppression – which is what gerrymandering is – is the most oppressive, the most invasive, most offensive violation against the most basic of our civil rights in America – the right to vote and have our vote count – and the court agreed.
But immediately after the court decision to overturn the district maps, Republican state Senator Scarnati threw a temper tantrum. His complaint – at least ostensibly – was that a court would have the audacity, the temerity, to overrule legislation – to overrule a legislature. He railed based on the rationale that the court is “attempting to play the role of ‘lawmaker'”. Scarnati said he would not comply with at least part of the order and declared the court’s ruling “unconstitutional”.
He accused the court of legislating from the bench, but then the legislator hypocritically declared a court ruling “unconstitutional.”
Does he not know that the role of the court is to do just that – to overrule legislation?
Does he not know that the role of legislator is to make legislation, not adjudicate from the legislature?
Contempt of Court
Scarnati refused to comply with at least part of the court order. How is that not contempt of court?
A common citizen wouldn’t defy a court order. So why would a man who is supposed to be a distinguished, educated leader, a politician, a state Senator, defy a court order? How can one Senator just refuse to follow a court order, and no other Senators (Republican or Democratic) do anything about it? Why aren’t state Democrats calling for the court to raise contempt of court charges against Scarnati and the Republicans?
Also, he said that he would also not comply with the part of the court order that required him to turn over certain data.
In his response letter to the court, Scarnati first said he would not turn over any data in the Court’s orders – then it said in a footnote “Senator Scarnati does not possess” any such data. Why would he say he would not turn over data that he does not possess??
Scarnati’s logic is flawed (and reeks of desperation). He argued that if the law says that a type of legislation is created by a legislature, that means it cannot be overruled by the court – because that would be “legislating from the bench.”
But if the court cannot overturn unconstitutional legislation, who can? If the court cannot determine and rule authoritatively regarding the constitutionality of legislation, who can? The same people who made that law? What then, would be the role of the court?
The destructive significance of Scarnati’s behavior goes even beyond contempt of court. If this line of reasoning is allowed to stand, it will set a catastrophic precedent – the precedent that courts can’t overrule legislation. That would be to effectively and literally disable the judicial system.
It is stunning and incredulous that Senator Scarnati and the Republicans in the state Senate are behaving in such an immature, dangerous, rebellious, and outwardly contemptuous manner toward the courts. He is outraged that the supreme court of the state would tell him – the Great Scarnati – what he can and can’t do. He even goes so far as to respond by pretending to be a court justice – he knows better than the judges what is and isn’t constitutional. How can a state senator declare a court order unconstitutional? He criticizes the court for legislating, yet he is a legislator adjudicating from the legislature.
What Scarnati and the Republicans are doing cannot be allowed to stand. If they can get away with defying the courts this time, they will continue to do it in the future – both in Pennsylvania and across the nation. They are attempting to prevent the court from doing its job – the job of checking the power of the legislature. The court makes decisions – that’s its job – and that job includes oversight of legislation – and of the legislature.
This is about the legitimacy, the efficacy, the essence, the existence of the judicial system itself. If the court can’t make rulings or enforce its own rulings, it has been rendered ineffective, invisible, useless, impotent. Allowing this type of behavior, this type of reasoning, sets an extremely dangerous precedent – but only if is allowed – or accepted.
Do not be fooled by this line of reasoning. Do not allow this type of behavior to stand. The system of checks and balances is under assault. The authority of the courts over the legislature must be defended and protected. The courts must ensure enforcement of their rulings.
Washington: Most House Republicans passed a bill that makes it harder for disabled persons to sue businesses for discrimination, allegedly in an effort to prevent opportunistic attorneys from taking advantage of business owners.
But many disability and civil rights groups fear the bill will weaken incentives for businesses to comply with the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), which mandates equal access to public accommodations.
The issue can be summarized as one disability rights lawyer wrote:
“Rather than go after people with disabilities, attention should be focused on stopping these few bad attorneys.”
We need for Committee Persons:
– 1 Committee Person candidate in Collegeville 1.
– 1 Committee Person candidate in Collegeville 3.
We need both candidates by February 13th and will help circulate petitions & provide information, support and training (not much needed right now).
Our mission is to assist in getting Democrats elected to office at every level. How
does that happen?
Before the Primary Election:
-Attend Area 4 meetings where you can meet candidates, learn about current topics
and strategies, and vote on questions as they arise.
– Canvass the homes in your precinct and circulate petitions for candidates within
the area of your voting precinct. Some offices (such as School Board Director)
require only 10 signatures in order for the candidate’s name to appear on the ballot.
Other offices (such as State Representative) require 300 signatures. Committee
people help circulate these petitions in order to ensure that candidates have enough
signatures for their names to appear on the ballot.
-Attend the endorsement meeting for candidates who will be on the ballot at your
voting precinct. This year, that meeting will occur on February 15th. A committee
person can vote to endorse a candidate in their district for State Representative and
for State Senator. If you are unable to attend, you must find a proxy to vote in your
place. A proxy must reside in your voting precinct and be a registered Democrat.
-Assist candidates in your area with door knocking, literature distribution, and
anything else they might need. This phase targets only registered Democrats and
-recruiting block captains
-creating lists of homes that are willing to host lawn signs
-recruiting poll volunteers
-creating email lists
-assisting with voter registration
-writing letters to the editor
For the Primary and the General Elections:
-Provide poll coverage at your poll from 7AM until the poll closes at 8PM. Ask
volunteers for help, and have campaign literature and goldenrod ballots available
-Stay after the poll closes to watch the vote count.
After the Primary Election:
-Continue to support candidates in the same manner as before the primary election.
This phase will also target independent voters and Republicans who are potentially
The Borough Council budget meeting, special session, is scheduled for Monday January 22nd at 7 PM in Borough Hall. Listed below is the planned agenda:
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. PUBLIC DISCUSSION (Items not on the agenda)
4. DISCUSSION OF 2018 BUDGET
A. Committee Requests
B. Mayor Request
5. DISCUSSION OF THE PERKIOMEN TRAIL CONNECTION
6. DISCUSSION OF BOROUGH COMMITTEES
7. OTHER BUSINESS
Looking forward to seeing you!